How it works
One loop, engineered
for reciprocity.
Give high-quality, structured feedback → earn credits → submit your own work → receive high-quality, structured feedback. Everything else exists to strengthen that loop.
Submit a track
Upload a demo, mix, section, or idea. Rough is fine — works in progress are the point. Your track is private: only assigned reviewers hear it.
Choose feedback areas
Tell reviewers where you want their ears: mix, arrangement, vocals, lyrics, guitar tone, structure, dynamics, atmosphere, hook. Focused asks get focused answers.
Give reviews to earn credits
Each review you request costs 1 credit. You earn 1 credit per accepted review you give — 1.5 for standout reviews. Nobody can extract feedback without contributing feedback.
Receive structured reviews
Matched peers listen to at least 80% of your track, leave timestamped notes, and answer focused prompts: first impression, strongest moment, one concrete fix, attention + replay.
Rate usefulness
Was the feedback specific and actionable? Rating is separate from agreeing. Useful ratings build the reviewer's karma and shape who gets matched with whom.
Upload a revised version
Turn feedback into a revision checklist, upload V2, and everyone who reviewed V1 gets notified. Reviewers compare versions and confirm the changes landed.
Build reviewer reputation
Karma, reliability, specialty tags, and badges accrue from usefulness — not volume, not popularity. Trusted reviewers earn queue priority and directed requests.
One song's journey
- Maya uploads “Silver Static” V1 — a rough demo — and asks for mix + vocals feedback.
- Three matched reviewers claim it. Each listens through and leaves timestamped notes.
- All three flag the buried vocal; two mark 1:15 specifically. One suggests a 300Hz cut.
- Maya rates two reviews useful and converts the notes into a revision checklist.
- She uploads V2. Her reviewers get notified: “Maya revised after your review — compare?”
- Two reviewers confirm the vocal now cuts through. One becomes a trusted reviewer.